A Review of Literature on Co-Design Process for Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63529/ajpe.v2i1.7655Abstract
The educational institutions in the Philippines continue to have all preparations in full swing as it ensures learning continuity amid the pandemic and even beyond. With technology as one of its aids and learning as its central concern, continuous exploration of technology use in various learning modalities might be co-designed with its learners, teachers, and researchers. This article contained a review of six studies centered on the
co-design process in integrating technology for education. The review focused on examining technology inclusions as to the process and outputs, exploring different co-design frameworks, and elaborating its implications to the Philippine basic education research agenda and the current learning modalities. With the gleam that the educational landscapes may eventually gain from collaborations among its stakeholders, this article explored the applicability of the co-design process in the context of basic education.
Downloads
References
Alghamdi, A. & Li, L. (2013). Adapting Design-Based Research as a Research Methodology in Educational Settings. International Journal of Education and Research. 1 (10).
Bäck, A., Friedrich, P., Ropponen, T., Harju, A. and Hintikka, K.A. (2013) ‘From design participation to civic participation – participatory design of a social media service’, Int. J. Social and Humanistic Computing, Vol. 2, Nos. 1/2, pp.51–67.
Barbera, E., Garcia, I. & Fuentes-Alpiste, M. (2017). A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Volume 18, Number 6.
Cañete, P. (2020). Google PH offers free webinars for schools and educators to encourage distance learning. NoypiGeeks. April 2, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.noypigeeks.com/apps-games-softwares/google-ph-free-webinars-distance-learning/.
Carbonilla Gorra, V. & Bhati, S. S. (2016). Students' perception on use of technology in the classroom at higher education institutions in Philippines. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 4 (3), 92-103.
Department of Education (2016). Adoption of the basic education research agenda. DepEd Order no. 39, s. 2016. June 10, 2016.
Department of Education (2020). Adoption of the basic education learning continuity plan for school year 2020-2021 in light of the COVID-19 public health emergency. DepEd Order no. 12, s. 2020. June 19, 2020.
Dotong, C., De Castro, E., Dolot, J., Prenda, M. (2016). Barriers for Educational Technology Integration in Contemporary Classroom Environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences. Vol. 3 No.2, 13-20.
EdutechAsia (2020). Live Webinar Series. Retrieved July 24, 2020 from https://www.terrapinn.com/exhibition/edutech-asia/Webinar.stm.
Friedrich, P. (2013). Web-based co-design: Social media tools to enhance user-centred design and innovation processes. VTT Science 34. Doctoral Dissertation. Espoo, Finland. June 19, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.vtt.fi/publications/index.jsp.
Garcia‐Sanz, M. (2019). Control Co-Design: An engineering game changer. Advanced Control for Applications. September 3, 2019. 1(1). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adc2.18.
Goodyear-Smith, F., Jackson, C. & Greenhaulgh, T. (2015). Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 16;16:78.
Gyi, D. & Campbell, I. (2010). The value of computer-based product representations in co-designing with older users. Journal of Engineering Design. Vol. 21, Nos. 2–3, April–June 2010, 305–313.
Hansen, A., Mavrikis, M. & Geraniou. (2016). Supporting teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge of fractions through co-designing a virtual manipulative. J Math Teacher Educ (2016) 19:205–226. DOI 10.1007/s10857-016-9344-0.
Holmlid, S. (2009). Participative, co-operative, emancipatory: From participatory design to service design. ServDes.2009. DeThinking Service, ReThinking Design. Conference Proceedings. November 24-26, 2009. 105-118.
Janssen, F., Könings, K., & van Merriënboer, J. (2017). Participatory educational design: How to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? Eur J Educ. 2017; 52:268–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12229.
Kennedy, M. & Dunn, T. (2018). Improving the use of technology-enhanced learning environments in higher education in the UK: A qualitative visualization of students’ views. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9 (1), 76-89.
Kennedy-Clark, S. (2013). Research by Design: Design-Based Research and the Higher Degree Research student. Journal of Learning Design. Vol. 6, No. 2.
Kyza, E. & Nicolaidou, I. (2017). Co-designing reform-based online inquiry learning environments as a situated approach to teachers’ professional development. CoDesign, 2017. VOL. 13, No. 4, 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2016.1209528.
Lember,V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019) The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation, Public Management Review, 21:11, 1665-1686, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807.
Miller, C. (2001). The Application of Carl Rogers’ Person-Centered Learning Theory to Web-Based Instruction. Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development [and] Practice Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (24th, Atlanta, GA, November 8-12, 2001). Volumes 1-2. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470102.
Mwandosya, G I., Montero, C. & Mbise, E. (2019). Co-designing of a mobile educational tool for innovative teaching and learning at the College of Business Edcation, Tanzania. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. July 2019. 18 (3).
Naranjo-Bock, C. (2012). Creativity-based Research: The Process of Co-Designing with Users. UX Magazine. Article No. 820. April 24, 2012. Retrieved from https://uxmag.com/articles/creativity-based-research-the-process-of-co-designing-with-users.
Nicolaou, C.; Matsiola, M. & Kalliris, G. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching methodologies through audiovisual media. Education Sciences. 9, 196. doi:10.3390/educsci9030196.
Nueva, M. (2019). A Literature Review on the Current Technocology in Education: An Examination of Teachers Use of Technology and Its Association to Digital Inequality in School. 12th DLSU Arts Congress. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. February 20, 21 and 22, 2019.
Peac.org.ph (2020). PEAC to host free webinar series for K-12 teachers and school administrators. Private Education Assistance Committee. May 26, 2020. Retrieved from https://peac.org.ph/peac-to-host-free-webinar-series-for-k-12-teachers-and-school-administrators/.
Pechenkina, E. & Aeschliman, C. (2017). What do students want? Making sense of student preferences in technology-enhanced learning. Contemporary Educational Technology. 8(1), 26-39.
Pohl K., Sikora E. (2007) Structuring the Co-design of Requirements and Architecture. In: Sawyer P., Paech B., Heymans P. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4542. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Sanders, E. & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts. 4:1, 5-18, DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068.
Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53-60. Retrieved from http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/890/346.
Treasure-Jones, T. & Joynes, V. (2017). Co-design of technology enhanced learning resources. The Clinical Teacher 2018. John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education. 15:281-286.
Trischler, J., Dietrich, T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2019) Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design. Public Management Review, 21:11, 1595-1619, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810.
Trischler, J., Pervan, S., Kelly, S., & Scott, D. (2018). The Value of Codesign: The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams. Journal of Service Research 2018, Vol. 21(1) 75-100. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1094670517714060.
UPOU. (2020). UPOU’s Free Online Courses will Train Teachers in Online Teaching. University of the Philippine Open University. Retrieved July 24, 2020 from https://www.upou.edu.ph/news/upou-s-free-online-courses-will-train-teachers-in-online-teaching/.
Young, S. & Nichols, H. (2017). A reflexive evaluation of technology-enhanced learning. Research in Learning Technology. Vol 25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal on Perspectives in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AJPE provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, authors retain copyright but allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the content, provided the original authors and source are properly cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
